Case Study · Banking × Linkroad

Application Portfolio Management with LeanIX.

A European banking group faced high fragmentation of architectural information across multiple repositories and teams, with significant complexity across applications, integrations and external dependencies.

The programme implemented Application Portfolio Management and enterprise architecture practices supported by SAP LeanIX, promoting a collaborative, data-driven approach aligned with the organisation’s digital transformation objectives.

7

entity types under governance

4

frameworks applied

4

core domains in scope

1

central portfolio baseline

Gallery
Portfolio dashboard
Capability map
Dependency view

Challenge

Fragmented information. Multiple repositories. No single view.

Architectural information lived in multiple repositories owned by different teams. Applications, integrations and external dependencies had grown to a level of complexity where no one group could describe the landscape end to end.

Decisions on cloud transformation, DORA readiness and AI governance all depended on that missing view, so the bank needed a governed baseline before committing investment at portfolio scale.

Without one reliable portfolio view, every strategic decision was being taken on partial evidence.

The case

Portrait image or diagram

The problem was not the technology. It was what nobody could see.

The bank had no shortage of architectural documentation. It had too much of it, spread across repositories and teams, each accurate in its own scope and impossible to reconcile with the others.

A governed baseline before anything else

The engagement began with governance: one owner, one model, one set of definitions. Applications, capabilities, processes, interfaces, technology components, data objects and providers were brought into a single structure in LeanIX, so every later analysis worked from the same source.

Rationalisation, not just inventory

With the baseline in place, application rationalisation identified redundancies and portfolio simplification opportunities, while technology risk management supported obsolescence analysis, cloud readiness and sourcing risk.

An inventory tells you what you own. A governed portfolio tells you what to do about it.

The bank now runs modernisation, cloud and compliance decisions against one current view, with data quality KPIs and executive dashboards keeping the model trusted as it evolves.

Neutral sector imagery

About the client

A European banking group

700+

applications, integrations and technology components brought under one governed portfolio.

A large European retail and corporate bank. Client name withheld under confidentiality; profile and figures are shared with the client’s agreement.

The outcome

What the programme delivered

01

Stronger business and technology alignment

Business, architecture and technology teams worked from one model, with collaborative governance and clear accountability for each entity.

02

A centralised, reliable portfolio view

Structured visibility across applications, capabilities, processes, interfaces and technology components.

One source, maintained, not a snapshot.

03

Redundancies made visible

Rationalisation exposed overlapping applications and duplicated processes, each with a named owner and a recommendation.

04

Modernisation accelerated

Obsolescence and cloud-readiness analysis turned the modernisation backlog into a sequence the business could fund.

05

Ready for DORA and AI governance

Dependency and interface mapping gave the evidence base that DORA reporting and AI governance reviews require.

Solution · APM with LeanIX

Govern the portfolio first, then decide.

Most portfolio efforts start by cataloguing systems. This one started by agreeing who owns what, which definitions apply and which decisions the model has to support.

Incremental adoption, use-case driven.

01

Establish governance

Ownership, definitions and decision rights agreed before any data is loaded.

02

Build the baseline

Applications, capabilities, processes, interfaces and providers modelled in one structure.

03

Rationalise and assess risk

Redundancies, obsolescence, cloud readiness and sourcing risk assessed against the baseline.

04

Map dependencies

Traceability between business and technology layers, so change impact is known in advance.

And after go-live?

The portfolio stays in the client’s hands: data quality KPIs, executive dashboards and integrations with corporate systems keep the model current without external effort.

Same fragmentation in your estate? Start with the baseline.

We can walk through how a governed portfolio view would work against your own applications, capabilities and priorities.